On Mon, 4 May 1998, Dominique Cormann wrote: > If for example MS did decide to put out a version of perl, but > didn't release the code as per GPL, who would sue them? Stallman could, and he probably would. So could Larry Wall, the actual author of perl. I imagine that the FSF would put up the money. Microsoft wouldn't stand a chance. -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: Micro$oft &... poneil
- Re: Micro$oft "... Kirk Rafferty
- Re: Micro$oft "declari... Joe Klemmer
- Re: Micro$oft "declaring wa... Shawn McMahon
- Re: Micro$oft "declaring wa... Bradley Kieser
- Re: Micro$oft "declari... Kit Cosper
- Re: Micro$oft "declari... Kirk Rafferty
- Who enforces GPL? (was)... Dominique Cormann
- Re: Who enforces GP... Kevin Mernick
- Re: Who enforces GP... William T Wilson
- Re: Who enforce... Patrick T. Berry
- RE: Micro$oft "declaring wa... Donald Greer
- RE: Micro$oft "declari... William T Wilson
- Re: Micro$oft "declaring wa... Shawn McMahon
- Re: Micro$oft "declaring wa... Chris \"Cranky Spice\" Harshman
- Re: Micro$oft "declari... Chris Fishwick