> >Could mean a move to debian or freebsd for servers. > > Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being functionally equivalent to RHL 10, > and for small servers I would have run 10 without question. No reason on > Earth for me not to use Fedora for those, since I expect to see RH put as > much into Fedora as they did into RHL... so no loss in functionality or > reliability or trustworthiness. > > What do you see differently?
Nothing yet, will have to wait and see. Stability is a prime concern with servers (one of the reasons we opted for RedHat in the first place). (Most of our servers still run on 7.3 with a few running on 9). It would be nice to move all servers (or at least the most important ones) to RHEL but cost is a problem for us. -- Ian -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
