Does this mean Red Hat is no longer putting ot their own OS?
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 02:22 am, you wrote: > At 17:37 9/22/2003, you wrote: > >On the other hand (from a University on a tight budget) I don't fancy > > forking out for large numbers of RHEL licenses and I'm not sure about > > running vital services on Fedora. > > > >Could mean a move to debian or freebsd for servers. > > Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being functionally equivalent to RHL 10, > and for small servers I would have run 10 without question. No reason on > Earth for me not to use Fedora for those, since I expect to see RH put as > much into Fedora as they did into RHL... so no loss in functionality or > reliability or trustworthiness. > > What do you see differently? -- Michael S. Dunsavage -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
