and less since Redhat will insist on several apps being removed due to potential licensing issues.
IANAL and TIMHO, but...
In the few cases I've seen so far (MP3 playback being the most visible), Red Hat and everyone else who distributes a commercial product is REQUIRED not to include them unless they comply with X or Y special provisions which, by the nature of Red Hat Linux, they cannot do. In these cases, much though we are not used to seeing corporations act responsibly, Red Hat is doing exactly that. Someone is saying (via their license terms) "do this or that, and if you can't/won't, then don't use my software" and Red Hat is respecting those terms.
How on God's green Earth is this a bad thing? Go bitch at the other guy for being restrictive if you don't like it, it's not Red Hat's fault.
-- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
