On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:57:01 -0400, Johnathan Bailes wrote > On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 09:18, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > > Hi Johnathan, > > > > It looks like not enough people voted with dollars and cents to ensure > > that RedHat could provide the services you're looking for. I see no > > reason to believe that Fedora will be less stable than RHL 10. If you > > need support you'll have to pay for it, the price is set by the market > > place. If someone else can provide what you need cheaper, by all means > > they're the correct choice for you. It would be great if RedHat could > > afford to be all things to all people, but we know that isn't > > realistic. The net result of this resent change may very well lead to > > more improvments to Linux, better support for the High end, and better > > community involvment in the low and mid markets. I just don't see any > > reason to worry yet. > > > > Sean. > > Before I go on. I run RH9 at home. I used RH at the last place I > worked. I do not like the behavior and configuration methods in > Suse. SuSeConfig is an evil mess that can wax custom options on the next > Online Update blah..blah.. blah.
[snip] What options are left to the SOHO server user if not Fedora or SUSE? I've never used anything except RH, but would like to start thinking about a fall back plan in case Fedora is too bleeding edge for my needs. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
