On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:25:15 -0600 "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 13:30 9/22/2003, you wrote: > >As far as i can see the only real difference from what we have today > >is: > > > >a) You can't buy a boxed set of Fedora > >b) You can't buy support for it either. > >c) The average developer can be more involved. > > > >Other than that, everything else will be the same. > > No, Benjamin has a point: another change (d) is that the free version > will not be "branded" Red Hat, as I also mentioned earlier. This _could_ > believably slow down adoption due to brand recognition, both in the case > of newbies choosing the well-known Red Hat for their Linux, but also of > people like Benjamin's boss (and mine, by the way) who choose or would > choose RHEL after seeing RHL at work, but who will not see Fedora in the > same light. > Perhaps, but i think most people are sophisticated enough to add RedHat in front of Fedora for themselves. Fedora is now a trademark of Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat will defend this trademark in order to protect the integrity of The Fedora Project. Also, there may very well be CD's made avaialble of the Enterprise versions so you can install those as a first step. They wouldn't be distributed by RedHat, but would still be free (as in beer & speech) if you didn't require support. Sean. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list