On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:25:15 -0600 "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, Benjamin has a point: another change (d) is that the free version > will not be "branded" Red Hat, as I also mentioned earlier. This _could_ > believably slow down adoption due to brand recognition, both in the case > of newbies choosing the well-known Red Hat for their Linux, but also of > people like Benjamin's boss (and mine, by the way) who choose or would > choose RHEL after seeing RHL at work, but who will not see Fedora in the > same light.
I think the answers you gave to people later in the day suggest that this isn't anything to worry too much about: On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 00:22:05 -0600 "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why? Personally, I see Fedora as being functionally equivalent to RHL > 10, and for small servers I would have run 10 without question. No > reason on Earth for me not to use Fedora for those, since I expect to > see RH put as much into Fedora as they did into RHL... so no loss in > functionality or reliability or trustworthiness. > > What do you see differently? On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:08:55 -0600 "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't expect them to do that, since this would alienate a huge part of > their community which in some way does generate "leads" for later RHEL > sales. I don't think either of us will convince the other, so let's > agree to disagree, realize that at least we understood each other, and > wait to see what reality turns out to be. > Regards, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
