> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: up2date > > At 15:22 9/4/2003 -0500, you wrote: > > >I send what was sent!!!!! > > That's the point, Otto. We all read the original post, and we all read > the > answer. Then, when we get to your post, we have to read everything ALL > OVER > AGAIN and there is no need for it... it wastes a lot of bandwidth and > a lot > of other people's time (and there are a few thousand readers on this > list). > I am not accusing you of changing anything, I am suggesting that you > do not > have to resend EVERYTHING that was sent. > > Please keep only the parts of the earlier message which are important > for > your answer, and delete the rest. In this message, the only thing that > mattered from the previous message was your one-line comment, so I > deleted > the other 50 lines of stuff that no longer mattered. It is considered > polite to do this, and it makes it easier for everyone to read and > understand your posts. > > Thanks, > > > -- > Rodolfo J. Paiz > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
You are going to be surprised that I in fact agree with you but I've been on this long enough to get criticized for both situation. You just happen to be on the keep it short list, there are those who say that if the previous replies are not included then they have to read the thread to keep up. Therefore you can't win for losing. In general, I believe in top post for that reason, but if you top post eventually someone will critize so it's best that you observe the post and see what the trend is. I just noticed your name appearing. My reply was very short and was in general SOP for this list. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
