On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:31, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
> > Ed Wilts wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
> > > 
> > >>Red Hat 9????  What happened to 8.1?
> > > 
> > > Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
> > > people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
> > > it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
> > > out why.
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure they released a beta for 8.1, did they not?
> 
> I'm even more sure you're wrong :-).  There was a release called Phoebe.
> Nobody from Red Hat said it was a beta of 8.1.

Nonetheless, announcing an open position for someone that will be
supporting the release of "8.1" says they were at least at some point
planning on an 8.1. Given that as of a few minutes ago anyway, the
position is still listed, it gets very confusing. 8.1 and 9.0??

-- 
Bill Anderson
RHCE #807302597505773
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to