On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
> Ed Wilts wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote:
> > 
> >>Red Hat 9????  What happened to 8.1?
> > 
> > Who says there should have been an 8.1?  Just because a whole bunch of
> > people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make
> > it so.  Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found
> > out why.
> 
> I'm pretty sure they released a beta for 8.1, did they not?

I'm even more sure you're wrong :-).  There was a release called Phoebe.
Nobody from Red Hat said it was a beta of 8.1.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to