On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 13:26, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:48:24PM -0600, John Nichel wrote: > > Red Hat 9???? What happened to 8.1? > > Who says there should have been an 8.1? Just because a whole bunch of > people assumed the next version number was going to be 8.1 doesn't make > it so. Red Hat doesn't pre-announce version numbers, and you just found > out why. > > Version numbers are for marketing.
Actually, they are advertising for a customer service person that will be supporting the rollout of 8.1. So I guess RH said so. :) -- Bill Anderson RHCE #807302597505773 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
