I've got 10 RH5.0 servers, I've got the slow FTP problem only on one,
with error messages : "eth0: timeout waiting for Tx RDC."
--
Jean-Christophe PRAUD - LUDEXPRESS
Game Web: http://www.pbm-chronos.com
Perso Web: http://www.brutaltruth.com
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu n'gah Bill R'lyeh Wgah'nagl fhtagn.
Gate News wrote:
>
> I have noticed the same thing.. FTP from anything but RH5 is extremely
> faster AND more reliable. This is suing both standard FTP and NCFTP
> (with and w/o the upgrade). Makes it hell to upgrade everything listed
> on the errata page...
>
> Bryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond Fung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, March 09, 1998 7:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Slow FTP -Reply
>
> >I think there is really some problem with ftp in Red Hat 5.0. I have
> an old
> >version Slackware (Kernal 1.1.59) Linux box as well as RH 5.0 box on
> the LAN.
> >Previously, we forwarded all Corporate Internet E-mail traffic to the
> >Slackware box for transmission so as to relieve the Netware Server
> workload.
> >Recently, we have re-directed all those traffic to the RH5.0 box, and
> then
> >found that there generated a long queue running up on the Netware
> Server.
> >
> >Before reading these E-mails, I thought my case was just occassional
> and
> >isolated one. But now, I do make some benchmarks for ftp between the
> two Linux
> >boxes and also from Win95. The result is interesting :
> >
> > GET (KB/second) PUT (KB/second)
> >SL ftp to RHL 840 / 860 / 870 22 / 22 / 21
> >RHL ftp to SL 19 / 19 / 21 790 / 840 / 900
> >W95 ftp to RHL 698 / 1094 / 994 2.07 / 2.09 / 2.09
> >W95 ftp to SL 542 / 497 / 520 852 / 800 / 443
> >
> >The RH 5.0 box is already far more superior in hardware configuration
> (P200 /
> >64 MB / 4.3 GB) than the Slackware Linux box (486@133 / 32 MB / 1.3
> GB).
> >
> >Can anyone explain why RH5.0 runs so consistently slow during ftp
> inward ?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Raymond.
> >
> >>>> Keith Dart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/10 9:46 am >>>
> >On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Ambrose 'Bo' Barry wrote:
> >
> >> I just set up RH5.0, downloaded the 18MB Netscape RPM file (at
> 28.8!) on my
> >> Win95 system, then tried to ftp it to my Linux box using Ethernet
> LAN cards.
> >
> >>
> >> It took just as long on the Ethernet LAN to transfer! (about 3000
> >> bytes/sec). Only two LAN cards on the LAN, total cable length of 10
> feet! I
> >> was using the FTP Explorer program on the Win95 computer.
> >>
> >> Any help at getting my Ethernet to run at Ethernet speeds will be
> >appreciated.
> >
> >Run Linux on both ends. 8-)
> >
> >=====================================================================
> ========
> >Keith Dart, Devtest Engineer
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cisco Systems phone:
> +1.408.527.1391
> >Network to User Business Unit pager:
> +1.800.365.4578
> >internal web page: <http://kdart-pc2.cisco.com> fax:
> +1.408.527.3778
> >=--------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> > .||..||. The network kicks butt.. No excuses.
> >=====================================================================
> ========
> >
> >
> >--
> > PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
> ARCHIVES!
> >http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
> /mailing-lists
> > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> > PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
> ARCHIVES!
> >http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
> /mailing-lists
> > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
> --
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
