> I wouldn't take it as passive-aggressive per-se. It's just super confusing. 
> Especially if you watch the discussion about future of Racket at RacketCon 
> where Matthias has stated it pretty clearly and other confirmed that - the 
> core team is doing all infrastructure maintenance more-or-less in their free 
> time because their primary focus is development (of various parts of Racket 
> ecosystem).


If the Racket community has grown enough recently (not sure where we stand 
right now), maybe we should take a look at what needs doing and which tasks can 
be split up to be done by different people.   Then ask for volunteers.  

James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/48254C71-400F-4820-8313-8352B50DD6B3%40biomantica.com.

Reply via email to