On 10/27/2010 12:24 PM, ext Max Waterman wrote: > On 10/27/2010 01:07 PM, Christian Kandeler wrote: >> On 10/27/2010 10:29 AM, ext Max Waterman wrote: >>> Do you really want the issue to disappear >>> just because customers decide that their time is better spend elsewhere? >> Yes, because obviously the issue is not important to those customers. > > So, you think it still shouldn't be fixed, just because no one reports > the issue.
The issue doesn't need to be fixed if no one thinks it's an issue. > Are all issues only reported if they're significant enough? > You can't think of any other reason an issue isn't reported? I recognize all the words in these sentences, but put together they don't seem to mean anything. > Perhaps it is more in Nokia's interest to get a problem fixed and the > 'customer' is only doing Nokia a favour by pointing it out...and they > don't care to put more effort into it and then go away thinking, "Well, > if they don't care, then neither do I". Enough of such things and I > could imagine people moving to another platform altogether. So an issue that's not important enough to file a bug report is important enough to abandon the product? Sounds implausible. Christian _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
