Peter Maydell <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:31, Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, could someone take this? >> >> I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it >> up-to-date and tested while it doesn't go in. >> >> CI run here: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/776103500 >> >> Based on master. >> Supersedes "target/arm: CONFIG_TCG=n part 1". > > I've taken patches 1-5 into target-arm.next. > Patch 6 doesn't apply on top of my tree, which is unsurprising > given that it's trying to move 9000+ lines of code in a single > patch. That's so much I couldn't even figure out how to recreate > the code movement locally. The diff is not very legible either.
Ugh, sorry about that. I forgot to apply --patience on this last resend. That diff should be just a sequence of 9k '-' lines and 9k '+' lines. I'll try to split it up, let's see how it goes, the ARMCPRegInfo arrays are huge, they might end up pulling everything with them.
