On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:31, Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, could someone take this? > > I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it > up-to-date and tested while it doesn't go in. > > CI run here: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/776103500 > > Based on master. > Supersedes "target/arm: CONFIG_TCG=n part 1".
I've taken patches 1-5 into target-arm.next. Patch 6 doesn't apply on top of my tree, which is unsurprising given that it's trying to move 9000+ lines of code in a single patch. That's so much I couldn't even figure out how to recreate the code movement locally. The diff is not very legible either. I think that patch needs to be restructured somehow so that it's a bit clearer that it's only doing code movement and a bit more likely that it might be possible to apply it without massive conflicts. thanks -- PMM
