On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:49:43 -0400 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Aug 15, 2011, at 05:46 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > >I don't think that is worth it. There is some value to keeping the API > >consistent with the style that has been used in the past. So, I vote for > >Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED. There's no real need to factor this any further. > >It's not hard and not important enough to introduce a new variation on return > >macros. Adding another return style makes the C API harder to learn and > >remember. If we we're starting from scratch, Py_RETURN(obj) would make > >sense. But we're not starting from scratch, so we should stick with the > >precedents. > > I can see the small value in the convenience, but I tend to agree with Raymond > here. I think we have to be careful about not descending into macro > obfuscation world.
How is Py_RETURN(Py_NotImplemented) more obfuscated than Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED ??? _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
