Le lundi 15 août 2011 à 13:16 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 00:02, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> >> It would sound more useful to have a generic Py_RETURN() macro rather than
> >> some specific forms for each and every common object.
> >
> > Since the macro is rather generic, sure, but the name should probably be
> > better since it doesn't necessarily convene the fact that a INCREF has
> > occurred. So maybe Py_INCREF_RETURN()?
>
> Aside from None and NotImplemented, do we really do the straight
> incref-and-return all that often?
AFAICT, often with True and False:
x = (some condition) ? Py_True : Py_False;
Py_INCREF(x);
return x;
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
