On Aug 15, 2011, at 05:46 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >I don't think that is worth it. There is some value to keeping the API >consistent with the style that has been used in the past. So, I vote for >Py_RETURN_NOTIMPLEMENTED. There's no real need to factor this any further. >It's not hard and not important enough to introduce a new variation on return >macros. Adding another return style makes the C API harder to learn and >remember. If we we're starting from scratch, Py_RETURN(obj) would make >sense. But we're not starting from scratch, so we should stick with the >precedents.
I can see the small value in the convenience, but I tend to agree with Raymond here. I think we have to be careful about not descending into macro obfuscation world. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
