On 5/8/07, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:16:57 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote:
>> I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that does not
>> support XML at all !!
>
> I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see that non-XML UAs may
> still want to support it only for transmitting text. But I think there
> should be a conformance class that does include the XML support, even if
> the baseline conforming implementation doesn't.
That makes sense. I added a "conforming XML user agent" class. I hope this
satisfies the people who replied in this thread (all in To:).
Fine by me, Thank you very much !
(I'm treating the comment from Stewart Brodie as a separate comment.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
