On Tue, 08 May 2007 11:49:17 +0200, Stewart Brodie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see why HTTP is mandatory either, to be honest, although I accept that that's what most scripts will use it for.
The problem is that things are not very well defined for non-HTTP thingies at the moment. If at some point we get a more protocol neutral version of the specification I think it would make sense to reconsider this particular statement within the conformance criteria, yes.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
