On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:16:57 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote:
I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that does not
support XML at all !!
I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see that non-XML UAs may
still want to support it only for transmitting text. But I think there
should be a conformance class that does include the XML support, even if
the baseline conforming implementation doesn't.
That makes sense. I added a "conforming XML user agent" class. I hope this
satisfies the people who replied in this thread (all in To:).
(I'm treating the comment from Stewart Brodie as a separate comment.)
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
