Yeah I’m fine with either - but would probably prefer a single big repo. Are your PromQl tests golang unit tests by any chance?
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 20:36, Julius Volz <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fine with the main org too. Then there's just the question of whether > we have one big compatibility repo for remote_write / PromQL / etc., or one > for each tested interface. There's definitely pros + cons for each > approach, but I'd ultimately be fine with either I think. > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 6:11 PM Tom Wilkie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I only suggested the -community org so its not in my personal org, to >> encourage contributions from the wider community. I would be happy to move >> it to the main prometheus org. >> >> As a monorepo guy, I'm less keen on a proliferation of many orgs so less >> keen on a dedicated prometheus-compatibility org... but could be convinced. >> >> Cheers >> >> Tom >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:48 PM Richard Hartmann < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:16 PM Julius Volz <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Great! I think as we start taking compatibility more seriously, we >>> could even create a home for remote_write / PromQL / ... compatibility >>> tests in either the main Prometheus org, or in a dedicated "Prometheus >>> Compatibility Project" org? >>> >>> I strongly believe that the best place for tests we consider official >>> is the main Prometheus org, as long as the main author is fine with >>> moving them. I do not have strong opinions about the specific repo >>> they live in. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAB58Z11dDoV2oR3MUZfQBHuQScixAVJHK__GOcFC-ZNEAU%2BuNQ%40mail.gmail.com.
