I'm fine with the main org too. Then there's just the question of whether we have one big compatibility repo for remote_write / PromQL / etc., or one for each tested interface. There's definitely pros + cons for each approach, but I'd ultimately be fine with either I think.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 6:11 PM Tom Wilkie <[email protected]> wrote: > I only suggested the -community org so its not in my personal org, to > encourage contributions from the wider community. I would be happy to move > it to the main prometheus org. > > As a monorepo guy, I'm less keen on a proliferation of many orgs so less > keen on a dedicated prometheus-compatibility org... but could be convinced. > > Cheers > > Tom > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:48 PM Richard Hartmann < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:16 PM Julius Volz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Great! I think as we start taking compatibility more seriously, we >> could even create a home for remote_write / PromQL / ... compatibility >> tests in either the main Prometheus org, or in a dedicated "Prometheus >> Compatibility Project" org? >> >> I strongly believe that the best place for tests we consider official >> is the main Prometheus org, as long as the main author is fine with >> moving them. I do not have strong opinions about the specific repo >> they live in. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6YoyHbL48Wu3RCJ2FYzJH%3DmnQq6ByUBL5MxTShXGiohKjgQ%40mail.gmail.com.
