On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:37:25AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:46:11PM -0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > On 2019-12-01, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch:
> > > - admits that parallel make is going to be used;
> > > - renames PARALLEL_BUILD to something that reflects its actual usage
> > > (and consumers as well): PARALLEL_USES_MAKE
> > > - adds a PARALLEL_MAKE_JOBS that allows the user to tweak the number
> > > of MAKE_JOBS used if they want (set to hw.ncpuonline)
> > 
> > What this actually does: If you set PARALLEL_MAKE_JOBS, then ports
> > that are marked DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel will be built with
> > MAKE_JOBS=${PARALLEL_MAKE_JOBS} for any regular "make build" outside
> > of dpb.
> 
> Ah.
> Thanks :-)
> 
> > So basically this (ab)uses DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel as a marker for
> > ports that are parallel-safe.  Okay, whatever.
> > 
> > I think PARALLEL_BUILD is a perfectly fine name and it took me ten
> > minutes to understand "PARALLEL_USES_MAKE".  I'll probably be puzzled
> 
> Thank you for telling us, I stopped trying to understand after 2 minutes.
> 
> > again the next time I look at this.  Yes, there are a very few ports
> > that set PARALLEL_BUILD=No and still do some form of parallel
> > building.  That's why they have a corresponding comment.
> > 
> > > --- editors/libreoffice/Makefile  6 Nov 2019 12:21:06 -0000       1.221
> > > +++ editors/libreoffice/Makefile  1 Dec 2019 10:26:58 -0000
> > > @@ -354,11 +354,11 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--without-java
> > >  .endif
> > >  
> > >  # XXX libreoffice has its own way to build things in parallel
> > > -PARALLEL_BUILD = No
> > > +PARALLEL_USES_MAKE = No
> 
> I still don't understand that naming.
> If I don't use make(1) I can't do parallel builds?

No, the way it works is that *by default* MAKE_JOBS is passed to
make as make -j${MAKE_JOBS}

Look at both ports that override it, they explicitly set it to NO because
they pass "MAKE_JOBS" *elsewhere* (and don't want to use make -j)

I tried for a less confusing naming than PARALLEL_BUILD.  Tell me what
to call it then.!

Reply via email to