On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:46:11PM -0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2019-12-01, Marc Espie <es...@nerim.net> wrote:
> 
> > This patch:
> > - admits that parallel make is going to be used;
> > - renames PARALLEL_BUILD to something that reflects its actual usage
> > (and consumers as well): PARALLEL_USES_MAKE
> > - adds a PARALLEL_MAKE_JOBS that allows the user to tweak the number
> > of MAKE_JOBS used if they want (set to hw.ncpuonline)
> 
> What this actually does: If you set PARALLEL_MAKE_JOBS, then ports
> that are marked DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel will be built with
> MAKE_JOBS=${PARALLEL_MAKE_JOBS} for any regular "make build" outside
> of dpb.

Ah.
Thanks :-)

> So basically this (ab)uses DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel as a marker for
> ports that are parallel-safe.  Okay, whatever.
> 
> I think PARALLEL_BUILD is a perfectly fine name and it took me ten
> minutes to understand "PARALLEL_USES_MAKE".  I'll probably be puzzled

Thank you for telling us, I stopped trying to understand after 2 minutes.

> again the next time I look at this.  Yes, there are a very few ports
> that set PARALLEL_BUILD=No and still do some form of parallel
> building.  That's why they have a corresponding comment.
> 
> > --- editors/libreoffice/Makefile    6 Nov 2019 12:21:06 -0000       1.221
> > +++ editors/libreoffice/Makefile    1 Dec 2019 10:26:58 -0000
> > @@ -354,11 +354,11 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--without-java
> >  .endif
> >  
> >  # XXX libreoffice has its own way to build things in parallel
> > -PARALLEL_BUILD = No
> > +PARALLEL_USES_MAKE = No

I still don't understand that naming.
If I don't use make(1) I can't do parallel builds?


> >  .if defined(MAKE_JOBS)
> >  NCPU=              ${MAKE_JOBS}
> >  .elif ${FLAVOR:Mparallel}
> > -NCPU!=             echo $$((`sysctl -n hw.ncpuonline` + 1))
> > +NCPU!!=            echo $$((`sysctl -n hw.ncpuonline` + 1))
> >  .else
> >  NCPU=              1
> >  .endif
> 
> The point of the infrastructure change is to dispense with the need
> for the "parallel" pseudoflavor here, so the pseudoflavor should
> just be removed.
> 
> -- 
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          na...@mips.inka.de
> 

-- 
Antoine

Reply via email to