On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 10:39:26PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 04:11:50PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > > I submitted this some time back [1], and here's what I maintain > > personally [2]. I think the shell completions should be named to match > > the port to prevent possible collisions. Otherwise it looks good to me. > Thanks, I did not look into the archives. > > jasper's argument of the script not being meant for packaging no longer > holds true and I consider `pkg_add leiningen' to get a working REPL > worth adding this port (again). > > Good catch on the shell completions, I fixed them to be > share/bash_completion.d/lein and share/zsh/site-functions/_lein, thanks. > > Except for a new PLIST there's nothing else changed in the new tarball. > OK? Any opinions, further feedback or OK to import?
leiningen.tgz
Description: Binary data
