On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 04:11:50PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > I submitted this some time back [1], and here's what I maintain > personally [2]. I think the shell completions should be named to match > the port to prevent possible collisions. Otherwise it looks good to me. Thanks, I did not look into the archives.
jasper's argument of the script not being meant for packaging no longer holds true and I consider `pkg_add leiningen' to get a working REPL worth adding this port (again). Good catch on the shell completions, I fixed them to be share/bash_completion.d/lein and share/zsh/site-functions/_lein, thanks. Except for a new PLIST there's nothing else changed in the new tarball. OK?
leiningen.tgz
Description: Binary data
