On 2016/03/17 19:24, Bryan C. Everly wrote:
> Stuart,
> 
> No objections from me.  I was just trying to stick to the 72 character line
> length limit and without splitting it, it took it over that.

There's no 72 character line length limit in ports Makefiles. There's
a preference for <=80 columns but it's not a hard limit (and some of
the lines are above this anyway, but I don't think it's hugely important
as long as it's not excessive).

> Anyone else willing to give me a second "OK" on this and do the commit on
> my behalf?
> 
> (just for the curious, I'm working up some ports to suggest that would give
> us more JDBC drivers to choose from so look for that next)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Bryan
> 
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>
> wrote:
> 
> > On 2016/03/17 19:05, Bryan C. Everly wrote:
> > > Stuart,
> > >
> > > Thanks for getting back to me!
> > >
> > > I've attached a new tarball that contains the suggested fixes.  What do
> > you
> > > think?
> >
> > OK with me. (Forgot to mention I'd probably also just go with
> > a longer line for MASTER_SITES rather than split it into two
> > variables, BASE_URL caused a bit of extra head-scratching
> > because it sounds like a name that might be used in ports
> > infrastructure - whoever commits could just change that if
> > you agree, I don't think it needs a new tgz).
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bryan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > A couple of minor things, in the script in files/:
> > > >
> > > > +LIQUIBASE_HOME=${LOCALBASE}/share/java/classes/liquibase
> > > >
> > > > LOCALBASE is "where other ports have already been installed", the
> > script
> > > > should use TRUEPREFIX instead i.e. "Base directory for the current port
> > > > installation".
> > > >
> > > > And in README,
> > > >
> > > > --classpath=/usr/local/share/postgresql/java/postgresql.jar
> > > >
> > > > The hardcoded /usr/local here should be ${LOCALBASE}.
> > > >
> > > > Rest is ok.
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to