On Mon, September 14, 2015 23:56, Alessandro Gallo wrote:
> Like this? I'm not good at this kind of stuff:
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/games/chocolate-doom/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.18
> diff -u -p -r1.18 Makefile
> --- Makefile 24 Feb 2015 23:40:02 -0000 1.18
> +++ Makefile 14 Sep 2015 20:46:38 -0000
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  # $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.18 2015/02/24 23:40:02 bentley Exp $
>
>  COMMENT = portable release of Doom, Heretic, Hexen, and Strife
> -V = 2.1.0
> +V = 2.2.1
>  DISTNAME = chocolate-doom-${V}
>  CATEGORIES = games x11
>  REVISION = 0
> Index: distinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/games/chocolate-doom/distinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.6
> diff -u -p -r1.6 distinfo
> --- distinfo 11 Dec 2014 08:10:51 -0000 1.6
> +++ distinfo 14 Sep 2015 20:46:38 -0000
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (chocolate-doom-2.1.0.tar.gz) =
> YpMF5/MoZZ8+k+ibk63J2k6ZtaNR5RzrdJ3PPj2ovNM=
> -SIZE (chocolate-doom-2.1.0.tar.gz) = 2129632
> +SHA256 (chocolate-doom-2.2.1.tar.gz) =
> rRHihxZnxvoGWKvy3LoM2bJvvWUe6N9Vrf3Bitj9Z0o=
> +SIZE (chocolate-doom-2.2.1.tar.gz) = 2127538
>
> Also, the 'patches' directory must be deleted, as those fixes have
> already been merged upstream. I don't know why it doesn't show up in
> the unified diff. Let me know if you need more info.

You nee to 'cvs rm' patch files and use 'cvs diff -uNp' to see the change.

>
> Thank you,
> Alessandro
>
> 2015-09-14 20:09 GMT+02:00 Ryan Freeman <r...@slipgate.org>:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 06:22:20PM +0200, Alessandro Gallo wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> I created an updated port of Chocolate Doom 2.2.1. Tested on amd64. Let me
>>> know if there's anything wrong and I'll try to fix it.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Thanks for this!  I am $MAINTAINER of this port, would you mind just
>> creating
>> a diff against the current port and posting the diff, inline, directly here?
>>
>> That is the preferred method of updating ports.  When submitting a new
>> entry,
>> by all means submit a nice neat .tar.gz like you did here.
>>
>> Just at $DAYJOB at the moment, but I'll try and look at this by this
>> evening.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --Ryan
>
>
>


Reply via email to