Alexandre Ratchov, 22 Nov 2014 11:22: > IMHO we should keep the message because upstream developpers have > added it for a reason. We could add a second message right after > the sio_stop() call to appreciate the time sio_stop() takes and if > this is annoying find a solution. > > In other words, let's fix the "bug" and let upstream remove the > warning
upstream is very open to patches and will commit them sooner than the port itself :) -f -- you don't have to be a cannibal to get fed up with people.
