On 2014/11/22 16:07, frantisek holop wrote: > Stuart Henderson, 22 Nov 2014 15:01: > > On 2014/11/22 15:55, frantisek holop wrote: > > > some ports guru might have a trick for this > > > > yeah, use the autoconf build in old-configure instead :-) > > could we focus on the port please? :)
er, the port could quite easily be modified to use that, upstream are still maintaining it. > waf is a very minor distraction, and if the stupid file > was included in the archive, nobody would even know > it is being used. incorrect. > y'all autoconf junkies have a heavy version of the > stockholm syndrome :p all autoconfiguration systems that I've seen suck, but at least we know how to work with autoconf (and to a lesser extent cmake) without going insane ;)
