I'm sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I was talking about the AUCTeX port. I tried to CC the maintainer but the address seems to be dead.
On 01/11/2013 01:31 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jas...@openbsd.org> writes: > >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:15:31PM +0100, Beni wrote: >>> On 01/11/2013 09:13 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Since we have had emacs 24 around for a while now in ports, would there be >>>> any >>>> reasons not to remove emacs 22 and 23? I think it'd be a bad idea to keep >>>> cluttering editors/ more than needed. >>>> >>>> If there are no objections (OKs also welcome) I'd like to zap them next >>>> week. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jasper >>> >>> I'm not sure but doesn't AUCTeX still depend on emacs 22? >> According to this page, AUCTeX works fine with Emacs 24: >> http://wikemacs.org/wiki/AUCTeX#Emacs_24_and_ELPA > > I was planning to update it, but got stucked on finding an elegant way > to ship emacs add-ons for multiple versions. Dropping 22 and 23 would > kinda solve the problem, but on the other hand Emacs now has a package > system that works reliably (for single-user setups, that is). >
