On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:31:11PM +0100, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jas...@openbsd.org> writes: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:15:31PM +0100, Beni wrote: > >> On 01/11/2013 09:13 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Since we have had emacs 24 around for a while now in ports, would there > >> > be any > >> > reasons not to remove emacs 22 and 23? I think it'd be a bad idea to keep > >> > cluttering editors/ more than needed. > >> > > >> > If there are no objections (OKs also welcome) I'd like to zap them next > >> > week. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Jasper > >> > >> I'm not sure but doesn't AUCTeX still depend on emacs 22? > > According to this page, AUCTeX works fine with Emacs 24: > > http://wikemacs.org/wiki/AUCTeX#Emacs_24_and_ELPA > > I was planning to update it, but got stucked on finding an elegant way > to ship emacs add-ons for multiple versions. Dropping 22 and 23 would > kinda solve the problem, but on the other hand Emacs now has a package > system that works reliably (for single-user setups, that is). Indeed, I was looking into updating devel/python-mode which turned out to be quite hairy. While 'M-x package-install <RET> python-mode' was done in no time. > -- > J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas > GPG Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
-- Cheers, Jasper "Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish"
