Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <jas...@openbsd.org> writes: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:15:31PM +0100, Beni wrote: >> On 01/11/2013 09:13 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Since we have had emacs 24 around for a while now in ports, would there be >> > any >> > reasons not to remove emacs 22 and 23? I think it'd be a bad idea to keep >> > cluttering editors/ more than needed. >> > >> > If there are no objections (OKs also welcome) I'd like to zap them next >> > week. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Jasper >> >> I'm not sure but doesn't AUCTeX still depend on emacs 22? > According to this page, AUCTeX works fine with Emacs 24: > http://wikemacs.org/wiki/AUCTeX#Emacs_24_and_ELPA
I was planning to update it, but got stucked on finding an elegant way to ship emacs add-ons for multiple versions. Dropping 22 and 23 would kinda solve the problem, but on the other hand Emacs now has a package system that works reliably (for single-user setups, that is). -- Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas GPG Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
