On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:22:36AM +0300, Antti Harri wrote:
> On Sunday 22 May 2011 03:46:55 Ryan Freeman wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 06:12:31PM -0400, Brynet wrote:
> > > Cool, thanks for looking at this Ryan and Antti for sending it to him, my
> > > patches made revision 1879-1881 so anything newer than that is cool.
> > >
> > > They rejected my change for OpenGL support though, this project dlopen's
> > > libGL.so.1 and libGLU.so.1.
> > >
> > > The following patch is needed for that, other things that might be worth
> > > fixing is the GTK+ frontend, and POLYMER. I think NEDMALLOC can be
> > > avoided.
> > >
> > > Good luck,
> > > -Bryan.
> >
> > Thanks, I've added that patch in. I also made additions to astub.c and
> > game.c for addsearchdir to check /usr/local/share/games/duke3d which makes
> > the shareware data pulled in with several of Antti's other Makefile
> > entries.
> 
> I personally don't like the extra "games" directory. Looks like some software 
> gets installed under "apps/" too. I'd like to know what the consensus is, any 
> developers got an opinion?
> 

I too would like some weigh-in in this area. I see now many existing games
such as quake2 and xscorch use ${LOCALBASE}/share/ without nesting in the
games directory. in fact the only ports data I have in ${LOCALBASE}/share/games
are for ports I've started/done myself. 


> > I'm not entirely sure if including shareware data with the port is a good
> > idea though, and perhaps it would be best served by a seperate
> > games/duke3ddata port akin to the current games/doomdata. thoughts?
> 
> I disagree. The non-free original data can be installed elsewhere by the 
> user, 
> there cannot be a port for that anyway so why split shareware out of the main 
> port?
> 
> > attached is an updated version of my port with heavy influence from
> > Antti's Makefile, thanks ;)
> >
> > all original patches outside of the libGL changes Bryan sent me have been
> > removed as Bryan's original patches have been merged upstream.
> >
> > Come get some.
> 
> -- 
> Antti Harri
> 

Reply via email to