rtorrent is fat, heavy and many depends from 3th party libraries. there is nothing wrong in rtorrent, but why not other light torrent client with ports ?
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:06:14 +0100 "Jiri B." <ji...@live.com> wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:54:55 +0200 > > From: mi...@elwix.org > > To: ports@openbsd.org > > Subject: Re: suggestion for new port > > > > Comment with C is get from freebsd port comment. After last mail from > > persg...@gmail.com changed to C++. But if look some strcpy statements found > > they above allocated memory for destination string without room for zero > > byte. > > > > Ok, when you want this port I will fix Makefile spaces and other things > > from your wishlist. > > it looks like ctorrent itself is not developed anymore and that enhanced one > has latest relase in 2008... > > what's wrong with rtorrent in ports? > > jirib > > -- Best Regards, Michael Pounov <mi...@elwix.org> ---------------------------------------------- ELWIX - Embedded LightWeight UNIX Universal multiplatform embedded OS
