rtorrent is fat, heavy and many depends from 3th party libraries.
there is nothing wrong in rtorrent, but why not other light torrent client with 
ports ?

On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:06:14 +0100
"Jiri B." <ji...@live.com> wrote:

> 
> > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:54:55 +0200
> > From: mi...@elwix.org
> > To: ports@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Re: suggestion for new port
> > 
> > Comment with C is get from freebsd port comment. After last mail from 
> > persg...@gmail.com changed to C++. But if look some strcpy statements found 
> > they above allocated memory for destination string without room for zero 
> > byte.
> > 
> > Ok, when you want this port I will fix Makefile spaces and other things 
> > from your wishlist.
> 
> it looks like ctorrent itself is not developed anymore and that enhanced one 
> has latest relase in 2008...
> 
> what's wrong with rtorrent in ports?
> 
> jirib
> 
>                                         

-- 
Best Regards,
Michael Pounov <mi...@elwix.org>
----------------------------------------------
ELWIX - Embedded LightWeight UNIX
Universal multiplatform embedded OS

Reply via email to