On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 07:20:10PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:47:31PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Heres my next patch, hopefully with fewer niggly errors. If you are > > going to be working on this, be careful with update-patches, as theres a > > SUBST_CMD on a patch. > > Also I have left march and mcpu in, as I am wondering if the runtime cpu > detection will be used instead. I don't know how this will behave. Does > someone have an old skool i386 we can put a package that was built on a > i686?
s/i386/i486/g I meant to say i486. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett (Freelance software developer / technical writer / open-source developer) http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett
