On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:47:17 +0100, Joel Sing <j...@sing.id.au> wrote: > > This specific inconsistency should be fixed upstream instead - this > will be in Go 1.23 (386, amd64 and arm were the first of the OpenBSD > Go ports, at which point EBADMSG was not in our system headers, > sames goes for ENOTRECOVERABLE, EOWNERDEAD and EPROTO, which I've > also fixed): > > https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/592795 > > Given that this is limited to two ports (which are already patched) > I'm not convinced it is worth carrying a diff in the Go port. Rather, > they can be removed when Go 1.23 lands. >
Thanks to backport it, and I'll take care of both this ports. -- wbr, Kirill
