On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 06:55:29PM +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On 7/11/07, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >does this really need _3_ new groups? what are the "realtime" > >and "pulse-access" groups for? > > > > After having a look around it seems that pulse-access group is needed > to allow other users to access to pulseaudio. realtime is needed to > have realitme enable in pulseaudio. I my user isn't in realtime group, > pulse audio run at 7-13%. In realtimegroup it run at 4-5%.
why? what is it doing differently? > Groups could be set in configure phase. But default behavior seem ok for me. group name should follow the conventions, e.g. start with _ also, pulseaudio has a sun audio interface. use it. I'm highly opposed to adding new ports that use an OSS audio interface if they have a sun audio interface. some hints: the 'eof', 'samples', and 'error' fields in struct audio_prinfo are different on (Open|Net)BSD than Sun. look at multimedia/xine-lib and devel/sdl for decent examples of how to use a sun audio interface with OpenBSD. if you make an honest effort and still have problems, I can help. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
