On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:19:26AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:53:43AM +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote:

> > Anyway did you test the port ? I'm very interrested in any feedback to
> > see what is needed to fix yet. Pulseaudio is a very interesting audio
> > server and framework and I'm interrested to have in ports. Please tell
> > me.
> 
> libatomic_ops should really be built as a dynamic library.
> 
> I didn't go much further than that thought.

please test the attached ports (should be no functionality changes).

and sort out LIB_DEPENDS/WANTLIB in pulseaudio.  you should know
how this stuff works if you want to maintain ports.

I still haven't even gotten around to actually installing pulseaudio.

does this really need _3_ new groups?  what are the "realtime"
and "pulse-access" groups for?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

Attachment: libatomic_ops-1.2-port.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz

Attachment: pulseaudio-0.9.6-port.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz

Reply via email to