On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 09:42:37PM +0200, steven mestdagh wrote: > Joachim Schipper [2007-07-08, 11:39:41]: > > On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:27:50AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:01:14AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:20:31AM -0400, Brad wrote: > > > > > mutt having SMTP support is pretty cool. Having SASL support enabled > > > > > would make it usable for a lot more users. > > > > > > > > And needlessly complicated for a lot more of us, who run their own MTAs > > > > to handle this sort of stuff. > > > > > > > > Not a bad idea, by any means, but I think it should be a FLAVOR. > > > > > > not another friggin mutt FLAVOR please. This port suffers from too many > > > flavors syndrome already. > > > > Maybe, but this adds a nontrivial dependency to a package that is at > > least partially useful because it's so lean. > > > > If you want to remove FLAVORs, I'd be happier to see the sidebar > > integrated into the main package (even though I don't use that either; > > but a larger portion of people might find it useful, and it's much less > > heavy). > > I also prefer to avoid this dependency in the default mutt package, > and don't really see a problem with a new flavor.
Could new flavor be enabled in bulk builds in that case? -- best regards q#
