On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:01:14AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:20:31AM -0400, Brad wrote: > > mutt having SMTP support is pretty cool. Having SASL support enabled > > would make it usable for a lot more users. > > And needlessly complicated for a lot more of us, who run their own MTAs > to handle this sort of stuff. > > Not a bad idea, by any means, but I think it should be a FLAVOR.
not another friggin mutt FLAVOR please. This port suffers from too many flavors syndrome already. -- Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
