On 2023/01/03 11:25:23 +0900, SASANO Takayoshi <u...@mx5.nisiq.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> previous ports cannot support alsa-plugin due to libdl detection,
> here is new ports with patch. (the patch is sent same as pull-request at
> https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-lib/pull/290 )

looked for curiosity; the patch for configure.ac can be simplified a
bit:

Index: configure.ac
--- configure.ac.orig
+++ configure.ac
@@ -255,9 +255,8 @@ AC_ARG_WITH(libdl,
   [ have_libdl="$withval" ], [ have_libdl="yes" ])
 HAVE_LIBDL=
 if test "$have_libdl" = "yes"; then
-  AC_CHECK_LIB([dl], [dlsym], [HAVE_LIBDL="yes"])
+  AC_SEARCH_LIBS([dlsym], [dl], [HAVE_LIBDL="yes"])
   if test "$HAVE_LIBDL" = "yes" ; then
-    ALSA_DEPLIBS="$ALSA_DEPLIBS -ldl"
     AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LIBDL], 1, [Have libdl])
   fi
 else

AC_SEARCH_LIBS tries first to see if the functions are provided in
libc and if not tries with the list of libraries provided (`dl' in
this case.)  It works equally well for linux and the BSDs.  (on linux
"-ldl" is automatically added to LIBS and handled by automake, and so
ALSA_DEPLIBS is not needed at all.)

(from a quick look upstream could switch also the other checks to
AC_SEARCH_LIBS and drop ALSA_DEPLIBS entirely.  the only place I'm not
sure is when looking for clock_gettime in -lrt)

I'd add a comment before NO_TESTS since there seem to be a regress
suite, but does not compile.

There are two places in src/pcm/pcm.c where it prints a time_t as it
were `long':


pcm.c:2357:6: warning: format specifies type 'long' but the argument has type 
'time_t' (aka 'long long') [-Wformat]
                          status->trigger_tstamp.tv_sec,
                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pcm.c:2360:3: warning: format specifies type 'long' but the argument has type 
'time_t' (aka 'long long') [-Wformat]
                status->tstamp.tv_sec, status->tstamp.tv_nsec / 1000);
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2 warnings generated.


could be patched to cast the time_t to `long long' and using the
"%lld" format.

No mean to test it.  Is it required by other ports for compatibility?
Port looks fine to me anyawy.

Reply via email to