On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:58:33PM +0100, Stefan Hagen wrote: > Either way, ok sdk@
Aargh, one thing I had in my tree but not in the sent tarball:
-PKGNAME = rnnoise-20210312
+PKGNAME = rnnoise-0.0.0.20210312
So once upstream uses versions, we have better changes of doing a
regular update rather than having to bump EPOCH because 20210312 is
greater than 1.0 or so.
What do other porters think in general about such ports that are
unversioned upstream?
I went for 0.0.0.date as that's used in a few other ports:
$ rg -t make '^(V|PKG|DIST).*=.*0\.0\..*' /usr/ports/
...
/p/fonts/siji/Makefile
4:DISTNAME = ${GH_PROJECT}-0.0.0.20190218
...
/p/comms/dump1090/Makefile
4:DISTNAME = ${GH_PROJECT}-0.0.0.20200203
Some use 0.0.date but a.b.c are common version schemes, so better use
0.0.0.date here.
New tarball with all feedack and above hunk included.
rnnoise.tgz
Description: Binary data
