Hello Marc,

On Sat, 08.07.2006 at 18:16:17 +0200, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I'm not saying that. Buf if it's autoconf-2.13, you'd better start
> by checking that, even without patching, you're re-creating an exact
> copy of the configure script when setting CONFIGURE_STYLE=autoconf.

well, I did check this in the meantime, and the results *are*
different. Because I didn't feel like judging that, I ignored
configure.in and patched configure instead.

Attached is the current version of the port, with *not* everything
tested, but at least the port now creates "useful looking" files,
though with (partially) imho very broken ownerships and permissions. I
tried to fix as many instances of executables (or scripts) being owned
by root:wheel and having mode 0550, but required to be accessible by
user _inn. If someone (Bernd?) can tell whether he can run INN w/o _inn
being a real account with valid home and shell, I'm very interested to
hear, but I couldn't even start it, so I mangled the @user statement,
too.

This port most likely still doesn't work, but it's getting closer.

Feedback is very much welcome!


Best,
--Toni++

Attachment: inn.tgz
Description: GNU Unix tar archive

Reply via email to