> On April 28, 2014, 3:25 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > good for me, is the same for me wether this is done explicitly here or in > > ecm if somebody else thinks they have the same usecase.
I'll ship it for now, I don't want examples installed on our release. If ECM gets support, I can adjust pretty easily. - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117814/#review56766 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 28, 2014, 12:39 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117814/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 28, 2014, 12:39 a.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma. > > > Repository: plasma-framework > > > Description > ------- > > Make examples optional (default to off) > > > Most users won't want to have tech demos on their real system. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CMakeLists.txt bc5d6d0 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117814/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Build both variants editing flag with CCMake > > > Thanks, > > David Edmundson > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
