On Wednesday 29 January 2014 17:09:32 Eike Hein wrote: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:22 Martin Graesslin wrote: > > Do we really need this one week in between? Just tag and release on the > > day > > of feature freeze. It's the responsibility of all of us to not screw up. > > Why add to the release schedule the possibility to screw up? We are giving > > out the hint that "it doesn't matter if you push your feature have > > finished, you have another week to fix it". We want an always releasable > > master, thus we don't want people to continue to do that. Features should > > be pushed if they are done and not half finished. > > FWIW, I don't feel as strongly about this as about the Beta->Alpha thing, > so if you all disagree with the week-long padding I don't mind much. In > general I even agree with you, except I think "always releasable master" > is something you achieve with the first release, not before.
depends on how much we value the stabilization before :-) I think it's doable if we want to and try to do so. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
