On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:00:17 Eike Hein wrote: > On Wednesday 29 January 2014 15:53:21 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > Let's aim for one week, we can delay the Alpha if need be, but > > realistically, we should only integrate things that are really done. Ways > > > to make the post- feature-freeze week not cause havoc: > One week (rather than the three days in the original timeline) > feels good, +1.
Do we really need this one week in between? Just tag and release on the day of feature freeze. It's the responsibility of all of us to not screw up. Why add to the release schedule the possibility to screw up? We are giving out the hint that "it doesn't matter if you push your feature have finished, you have another week to fix it". We want an always releasable master, thus we don't want people to continue to do that. Features should be pushed if they are done and not half finished. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
