On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:36:22 Martin Graesslin wrote: > Do we really need this one week in between? Just tag and release on the day > of feature freeze. It's the responsibility of all of us to not screw up. > Why add to the release schedule the possibility to screw up? We are giving > out the hint that "it doesn't matter if you push your feature have > finished, you have another week to fix it". We want an always releasable > master, thus we don't want people to continue to do that. Features should > be pushed if they are done and not half finished.
FWIW, I don't feel as strongly about this as about the Beta->Alpha thing, so if you all disagree with the week-long padding I don't mind much. In general I even agree with you, except I think "always releasable master" is something you achieve with the first release, not before. Cheers, Eike _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
